Defording Sports: Baryshnikov Leaps! He Scores!
As an avid listener to National Public Radio (NPR), I often hear Frank Deford, the senior contributing writer at Sports Illustrated pontificate on the sporting world. His commentaries run each Wednesday on NPR. Usually, I am in the shower and as we all know, some of our best thinking goes on in the shower. Sometimes I agree with Mr. Deford and sometimes I have not a clue where he is coming from.
That was the case yesterday with his commentary, “Sports, the Rodney Dangerfield of Academia?” He was reflecting on the comments of Princeton University, Athletic Director Gary Walters comments on sports and the arts. Deford says, "Is it time," he (Walters) asks, "for the educational-athletic experience on our playing fields be accorded the same ... academic respect as the arts?"
Deford responds, “Well, apart from simply being so sweaty, I think that sport has suffered in comparison with the arts — or should I say: the other arts — because it is founded on trying to win. Artists are not supposed to be competitive. They are expected to be above that. We always hear "art for art's sake." Nobody ever says "sport for sport's sake."
Well, it may not be as sweaty, but if you have had to play Beethoven’s or Shostakovich’s Fifth symphonies in concert, you might have worked up a bit of a sweat. I think Mr. Deford’s assertion that artists are not supposed to be competitive is not quite accurate. I guess he has never heard of the Tchaikovsky piano competition, a high school band competition or the local art show. Competition can come out in the arts. Some artists do just believe in “art for art’s sake”. Then again one of the eternal questions is, “What is art?” Since the answer is always indefinite, it really leaves the belief in art for art’s sake rather moot.
As for "sport for sport’s sake", that has been said also. Many sports leagues for children stress, the joy of playing the game and making sure everyone gets to play, over the final score. I think you can also say that sport for sport’s sake is in how the game is played as well. It used to be commonplace that good sportsmanship (fair play, no cheating, respect for coaches, officials and opponents etc.) was held up as an axiom of athletic competition. It is harder and harder to find that. Mr. Deford, in case you did not know it, there are no members of the San Francisco Symphony that we know of, on the “juice” to play their instrument better, as opposed to a certain home run king with the San Francisco Giants baseball club.
Later in his commentary, Mr. Deford makes a one to one comparison with Michael Jordan and Mikhail Baryshnikov. “…Is not what we saw Michael Jordan do every bit as artistic as what we saw Mikhail Baryshnikov do?” Well, yes in a way. Perhaps we could say one was “athletic” and the other was “artistic”. No one can deny that to see the human body move in beautiful and extraordinary ways is inspiring. To say that we must somehow equate the athletic with the artistic is not being fair to either in my opinion. I have only ever felt there was one sport where human movement in athletic competition merged with artistry and that is figure skating. The sport is judged on both the athletic and the artistic. No offense to the skating guys, but I find women’s figure skating to be the paragon of grace, style, beauty and action in human form. Therefore, Frank, I will give you that with women’s figure skating.
The Princeton athletic director, Walters, is quoted by Deford, “Athletic competition nourishes our collective souls and contributes to the holistic education of the total person in the same manner as the arts." It is true that athletic competition can be very good for young people in contributing to their overall development. Development, appreciation and understanding of one’s body fit can happen in sports. Social growth can also happen by learning discipline and the ability to work with others. Studying the details of a sport can also develop the mind; it’s strategies and techniques. The problem is, these days, from children on up, these ideals are constantly at risk of being undermined by an ethic that one must win and win at almost any cost. The Oakland Raiders motto of “Just Win Baby” seems to have consciously or unconsciously seeped into our culture.
Recently, I read a post from a Cincinnati Bengals’ fan board, frustrated with their recent losing streak, who wanted all the talented players that had been accused or convicted of crimes in recent years back with the team because, “I want to win!” What a sad commentary on our society that is.
Frank Deford wonders, “Why can a young musician major in music, a young actor major in drama, but a young football player can't major in football? That not only strikes me as unfair, but it encourages the hypocrisy that contributes to the situation where those hidebound defenders of the artistic faith can take delight in looking down their noses at sport.”
Well, let us say you can major in a sport. How is that curriculum going to be built? Sure, the on the field activities can be a student’s lab section. What about the rest of the time? How about a course in the History of Football? How are we going to grade them? Does a linebacker get bonus points for every sack in a game? Yes, I suppose you could do that. You could build a football major, or soccer, tennis, field hockey and the like. You would be cheating the student though Mr. Deford, at least the ones who never make it to or have a professional level in their sport.
You are forgetting about their lives after the average age of thirty-five for professionals and right after college for others. What are they to do with their baseball major, if they cannot make a career of it? I know we could sarcastically joke about English majors in the same way, but they can at least teach to use their major. The sport major could teach by coaching, but coaching positions in sports are fewer than English teachers. Overall, the wisest college athlete, even if he or she becomes a professional, knows that someday the body will say enough, and that having a career after sports will be almost a necessity. That is why you need to get a degree in something other than a sport.
Mr. Deford makes a generalization that people who are artists look down at sports. Yes, I am sure there are snobs out there who act like the old sitcom character Frasier Crane, when it comes to sports. I am sure also that there are some who look down at the arts and hail sports as the most important endeavor on the planet.
Then there were those rare persons who transverse both like former
Cincinnati Bengal of the 1970’s, Mike Reid who played football and was
an accomplished pianist. He has even gone on to write a one-act opera
called, “Different Fields” about a professional football team. It kind
of busts your generalization does it not Frank? As someone who
literally grew up around a professional football team and likes the
arts, I guess I should look down at myself also.
No, it is
just a matter of having perspective and appreciation for both sports
and the arts. At their best, each contributes to the betterment of
people and society around the world. Where they on occasion crossover
we can appreciate that, but let us just keep them as separate
undertakings each with their own value.
I hope to have more "Defording Sports" columns in the future here at Gentleman Agitator. I respect Frank Deford’s work and his thought provoking commentaries. That is why I enjoy sparring with his ideas.

Recent Comments